Skip to main content

NIST CSF 2.0 Respond – Response Communications (RS.CO) Explained


In every major incident I’ve led or observed, technical containment was rarely the hardest part.

Communication was.

I’ve seen well-contained incidents spiral into reputational damage, regulatory scrutiny, and executive loss of confidence—not because the response failed, but because the messaging did.

That is exactly why NIST CSF 2.0 Respond – Response Communications (RS.CO) exists as a standalone category. It recognizes a simple truth:

How you communicate during an incident can matter as much as how you respond technically.

What Is Response Communications (RS.CO) in NIST CSF 2.0?

RS.CO focuses on ensuring that internal and external communications during and after a cybersecurity incident are timely, accurate, coordinated, and appropriate to the audience.

In practical terms, RS.CO answers:

“Who needs to know what, when, and how—and who decides?”

Under CSF 2.0, Response Communications covers:

  • Internal stakeholder updates

  • Executive and board briefings

  • Legal and regulatory notifications

  • Customer and partner messaging

  • Coordination with law enforcement or third parties

This is not a PR function alone. It is a risk management discipline.

Why RS.CO Matters to CISOs and Executives

From an executive perspective, poor communication:

  • Creates confusion and speculation

  • Increases legal and regulatory exposure

  • Undermines credibility with customers and employees

  • Erodes trust in leadership

Strong RS.CO, on the other hand:

  • Enables faster decision-making

  • Keeps leadership aligned

  • Protects the organization’s narrative

  • Demonstrates control under pressure

Executives judge security leadership less by what happened and more by how it was handled and communicated.

Core Objectives of RS.CO

A mature Response Communications capability ensures:

  1. Information flows quickly—but deliberately

  2. Messages are consistent across audiences

  3. Legal, privacy, and regulatory considerations are embedded

  4. Executives receive clear, decision-ready updates

  5. External messaging protects the organization without misleading

Silence and over-sharing are equally dangerous.

How to Implement RS.CO Effectively

1. Predefine Communication Audiences and Triggers

RS.CO should never be improvised.

Organizations must predefine:

  • Internal notification thresholds

  • Executive escalation triggers

  • Regulatory reporting criteria

  • Customer or partner notification requirements

When incidents occur, the debate should not be about whether to communicate—only what.

2. Establish Clear Ownership and Approval Authority

One of the most common failures I see is unclear ownership.

RS.CO requires clarity on:

  • Who drafts messages

  • Who approves them

  • Who delivers them

  • Who can speak externally

Aspiring CISOs should push for documented authority, especially during crises.

3. Tailor Communications to the Audience

Effective incident communication is not one-size-fits-all.

Different audiences need different levels of detail:

  • Analysts: technical facts and actions

  • Executives: impact, options, and decisions

  • Legal/regulatory: accuracy and defensibility

  • Employees/customers: clarity and reassurance

Over-technical messaging creates confusion. Over-simplified messaging creates mistrust.

4. Maintain an Accurate and Evolving Narrative

Early information is often incomplete.

Strong RS.CO practices:

  • Clearly state what is known vs unknown

  • Update messaging as analysis evolves

  • Avoid speculation and assumptions

  • Maintain version control of communications

Credibility is built through transparency and consistency, not certainty.

5. Document Communications for Accountability and Learning

Every significant communication should be:

  • Logged

  • Time-stamped

  • Archived

This supports:

  • Regulatory reviews

  • Executive retrospectives

  • Legal defensibility

  • Continuous improvement

If it wasn’t documented, it didn’t happen—at least in hindsight.

Metrics to Measure Response Communications Effectiveness

Operational Metrics

  • Time to executive notification

  • Time to regulatory notification (where applicable)

  • Communication approval cycle time

  • Frequency of corrective follow-up messages

Effectiveness Metrics

  • Executive satisfaction with incident briefings

  • Messaging consistency across audiences

  • Communication-driven escalations or confusion

  • External impact tied to messaging failures

Maturity Metrics

  • % of incidents with documented communication plans

  • Frequency of communication tabletop exercises

  • Legal and PR participation rates in incidents

  • Post-incident communication lessons implemented

Good metrics focus on clarity, confidence, and control—not volume.

Common RS.CO Pitfalls

These issues repeatedly undermine response efforts:

  • Delayed executive notifications

  • Over-sharing unverified details

  • Legal and PR brought in too late

  • Conflicting messages across teams

  • Treating communication as an afterthought

In many high-profile breaches, the communications failure caused more damage than the attacker.

Final Guidance for Aspiring CISOs

Response Communications is where technical credibility meets executive leadership.

During incidents:

  • Leaders look for clarity

  • Employees look for direction

  • Customers look for honesty

  • Regulators look for discipline

If Incident Analysis is about understanding the truth, RS.CO is about communicating it responsibly.

Master Response Communications, and you dramatically increase your effectiveness as a security leader—especially when it matters most.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Asset Management - Physical Devices - What do you have? Do you know?

Asset management and inventorying your physical systems, we all know we should do it, and I am sure most try.  I am not going to talk about the should have, would have or could have. Instead, I am going to focus on the risks associated with the NIST CSF control ID-AM.1.   The control simply states, “Physical devices and systems within the organization are inventoried.”  At the simplest level, this control is saying that the organization inventories all physical systems that are apart of the information system. In my opinion, the control is foundational because how can you secure something if you don't know it exists.  If you are not inventorying your systems, how do you know if they have adequate controls to protect the data and network.   If you had a breach of data, would you know what type of data was involved, or would you even know if you had a breach?  To further extend this, how can you perform a risk assessment on the system to understand and relay ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Vulnerability Management… It’s easy - Planning

I am sure you have had either consultants, vendors, or heard at a conference that vulnerability management is foundational security control.  While I agree that it is an essential control, I also understand that it is challenging to implement.  Vulnerability management is not just to pick a tool, scan, and fix issues.  Many components make it a complicated journey.  This series will attempt to help break it down and give you ideas on how this complex service and be delivered effectively.    Planning   Objective When you start, I recommend creating a targeted objective and set of measures against your objective.   Ensure that you keep in mind your organization’s culture, politics, and risk appetite as you are developing your objective.   I have seen some target just “critical” systems for regulatory compliance, whereas others have targeted their entire enterprise.   No matter your scope, keep in mind your team’s current resource...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Detect Function in NIST CSF 2.0: The Risk of Seeing Too Late—or Too Much

In NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (CSF 2.0) , the Detect function represents the organization’s ability to identify the occurrence of a cybersecurity event in a timely and reliable manner . While Protect focuses on reducing the likelihood of compromise, Detect determines how quickly and how accurately an organization recognizes that something has gone wrong. For CISOs and security leaders, detection is where many programs quietly fail. Not due to a lack of tools, but due to poor signal quality, unclear objectives, and misalignment with business impact. Detection that is late, noisy, or misunderstood can be as damaging as no detection at all. Official NIST CSF 2.0 guidance is available here: https://www.nist.gov/publications/nist-cybersecurity-framework-csf-20 What the Detect Function Is (and What It Enables) Under CSF 2.0, the Detect (DE) function focuses on outcomes related to: Continuous monitoring Anomalies and event detection Security logging and analysis Threat intelligence ...
Post a Comment
Read more