Skip to main content

About Me

Brian Weidner
Chief Information Security Officer  |  Cybersecurity Executive  |  Thought Leader
20+ Years Building Security Programs That Drive Business
“Security isn’t the department that says no — it’s the team that figures out how to say yes safely.”
About Me

I’m Brian Weidner, and I’ve spent more than two decades doing one thing: building security programs that actually work for the business — not just for the audit.

As the Global Chief Information Security Officer at A. O. Smith Corporation, I lead information security strategy, risk governance, and cyber resilience for a global manufacturing enterprise. But my career has never been confined to one industry or one kind of problem. I’ve built and led security programs from the ground up across manufacturing, banking, automotive, and high-tech sectors — each with its own threat landscape, culture, regulatory environment, and definition of risk.

That breadth is deliberate. It makes me a better CISO, a more credible partner, and a sharper strategist. When you’ve navigated the compliance demands of banking, the operational technology challenges of manufacturing, the pace of high-tech, and the supply chain complexity of automotive, you stop seeing security as a checklist. You start seeing it as a discipline — one that must flex to serve the organization, not the other way around.

My Philosophy: Security as a Business Enabler

Too many security programs are built to defend against the business. Mine are built to move with it.

I operate with what I call the “yes and” mindset: when a business partner brings a new initiative, technology, or direction to the table, the conversation doesn’t start with what we can’t do. It starts with how we can enable it — securely, intelligently, and without slowing down the people who drive the organization’s value. That’s not naivety about risk. It’s a deliberate strategic posture grounded in trust, credibility, and deep business partnership.

Security is most effective when it’s embedded in the business, not bolted onto it. I spend as much time understanding revenue goals, operational constraints, and stakeholder priorities as I do analyzing threat landscapes. That’s what allows me to build programs that leadership actually funds, that teams actually follow, and that the business actually values.

“Security that can’t be operationalized isn’t security — it’s theater. The best programs are the ones the business doesn’t have to fight around.”
Areas of Expertise
Security Program Design Risk Governance Executive Communication OT / ICS Security Regulatory Compliance Board-Level Reporting Incident Response Security Architecture Threat Intelligence Agile Transformation Vendor Risk Management Team Building & Culture
Industry Experience

I’ve led security programs across industries where the stakes, threat models, and operational realities couldn’t be more different:

Manufacturing — Protecting operational technology, industrial control systems, and global supply chains at A. O. Smith and beyond.
Banking & Financial Services — Navigating high-stakes regulatory environments with zero tolerance for control gaps.
Automotive — Securing complex supplier ecosystems, embedded systems, and IP-intensive development environments.
High Technology — Balancing speed-to-market with security by design in fast-moving product organizations.

Each of these environments has sharpened my ability to build programs that are fit-for-purpose — calibrated to the actual risk appetite, regulatory context, and operational reality of the organization.

Leadership Approach

I build security programs the way I build security teams: around trust, shared purpose, and a commitment to continuous improvement. My leadership style is collaborative and direct. I set clear expectations, develop my people intentionally, and hold myself and my teams accountable for outcomes — not just activities.

I bring an agile approach to security transformation. Rather than delivering security as a multi-year waterfall program that the business endures, I build iterative roadmaps that deliver early value, adapt to change, and demonstrate progress in terms leadership understands. That approach has consistently accelerated program maturity while maintaining the organizational buy-in that sustains it.

I’m also a practitioner-communicator — equally comfortable in a technical deep-dive with my engineering team as I am presenting cyber risk to the board in business language. Bridging that gap is one of the most valuable things a CISO can do, and it’s something I’ve made a deliberate part of my leadership identity.

Thought Leadership

This blog — InfoSec Made Easy — is where I bring the practitioner perspective to cybersecurity leadership topics that don’t always get the treatment they deserve. I write for CISOs, aspiring security leaders, and professionals who are serious about building programs that connect security to business outcomes.

My writing covers the topics I care most about: building and maturing security programs, translating cyber risk for executive audiences, navigating regulatory complexity, and developing the leadership skills that separate good security managers from great CISOs. Everything I publish is grounded in lived experience, not theory.

Topics I cover regularly include:

  • CISO leadership and career development
  • Security program design and transformation
  • Regulatory frameworks: NIST CSF, GDPR, DPDP, SOC 2, ISO 27001
  • Board and executive communication
  • Emerging threats and risk management strategy
Let’s Connect

I’m always interested in connecting with other security leaders, sharing perspectives on the industry, and contributing to the conversations shaping our field. If you’re a recruiter, executive, or fellow practitioner looking to engage, I welcome the conversation.

Find me on LinkedIn at linkedin.com/in/brianweidner, or explore more of my writing right here at InfoSec Made Easy.

Brian Weidner  |  CISO, A. O. Smith Corporation  |  infosecmadeeasy.com

Popular posts from this blog

CISO Brief: February 11, 2026 – Critical Vulnerabilities, Nation-State Threats, and Ransomware Developments

Staying ahead of emerging threats is essential for enterprise resilience. This week brings a mix of critical vulnerabilities, advanced ransomware, and sophisticated nation-state activity. CISOs should prioritize patching, review detection capabilities, and prepare executive responses to evolving risks. Below are the top items requiring immediate attention, notable developments, and a concise action checklist. Top Items CISOs Should Care About (Priority) Microsoft Patches 59 Vulnerabilities Including Six Actively Exploited Zero-Days What happened: Microsoft released patches for 59 vulnerabilities, including six zero-days currently being exploited in the wild. Why it matters: Unpatched systems are at high risk of compromise and regulatory scrutiny. What to verify internally: All Microsoft systems are patched promptly, especially endpoints and servers. Vulnerability management processes are up to date and effective. Critical assets are prioritiz...

Generative AI Governance: Using the NIST Framework to Build Trust, Reduce Risk, and Lead Secure AI Adoption

Generative AI has moved faster than nearly any technology security leaders have dealt with. Tools that can generate text, code, images, and data insights are now embedded into productivity platforms, security tooling, development workflows, and business operations—often before security teams are formally involved. For CISOs, this creates a familiar but amplified challenge: innovation is happening faster than governance, and unmanaged generative AI introduces material risk across confidentiality, integrity, availability, compliance, and trust. For aspiring information security professionals, AI governance represents a growing and valuable discipline where strategic thinking matters just as much as technical depth. The good news? We don’t need to invent governance from scratch. NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) provides a practical, flexible structure that security leaders can use today to govern generative AI responsibly and defensibly. Why Generative AI Governance Matt...