Skip to main content

NIST CSF 2.0 – Protect Function Deep Dive: Awareness and Training (PR.AT)


Most organizations don’t fail at cybersecurity because they lack tools.

They fail because people do the reasonable thing in an unreasonable situation:

  • Clicking a convincing link

  • Reusing a password to get work done

  • Sharing files the fastest way, not the safest

  • Bypassing controls that slow them down

PR.AT exists because humans are not the weakest link—they are the most influential one.

NIST CSF 2.0 explicitly recognizes that cybersecurity awareness and training are not “nice-to-have” activities. They are protective controls that reduce risk every single day.

Where PR.AT Fits in the Protect Function

So far, Protect has focused on structural controls:

  • PR.AA ensures only the right identities have access

  • Controls, permissions, and authentication enforce boundaries

PR.AT addresses something different:

How people think, decide, and behave when controls are present—or when they fail.

No control operates in isolation.
People configure it.
People use it.
People override it.

PR.AT is the layer that helps people make safer decisions when security matters most.

What Is PR.AT (In Plain Language)?

PR.AT ensures that people understand their cybersecurity responsibilities and are trained to act appropriately for their role.

This is not just:

  • Annual compliance training

  • Watching a video once a year

  • Clicking through slides to “check the box”

PR.AT is about building confidence, not fear.

It answers questions like:

  • What should I do if something feels wrong?

  • How do attackers really trick people?

  • What does security expect of me—specifically?

  • How do I do my job securely without slowing down?

Why Awareness and Training Matter More Than Ever

Technology has gotten better.
Attackers have gotten smarter.
And work has gotten faster.

Today:

  • Phishing emails are personalized and realistic

  • Deepfakes target executives

  • Credential theft bypasses many perimeter controls

  • Employees juggle dozens of systems and alerts

In this environment, decision-making matters more than memorization.

PR.AT helps organizations shift from:

“Don’t click bad links”

To:

“Recognize suspicious behavior and respond correctly under pressure”

Common PR.AT Pitfalls

1. Treating Training as a Compliance Exercise

If awareness exists only to satisfy audits:

  • Employees disengage

  • Lessons aren’t retained

  • Risk doesn’t meaningfully change

Completion ≠ understanding.

2. One-Size-Fits-All Content

Executives, developers, HR, finance, and IT face very different risks.

When everyone gets the same training:

  • It’s irrelevant to most

  • Critical roles remain underprepared

  • Advanced users feel talked down to

3. Fear-Based Messaging

Constant warnings that “everything is dangerous” lead to:

  • Alert fatigue

  • Risk normalization

  • Employees hiding mistakes instead of reporting them

Effective awareness builds trust, not anxiety.

How to Implement PR.AT in a Practical Way

1. Define Security Expectations by Role

Start by answering:

  • What decisions does this role make?

  • What access do they have?

  • What mistakes would have the biggest impact?

Training should map directly to real job responsibilities, not generic threats.

2. Teach Recognition, Not Just Rules

Rules tell people what to do.
Training should explain why it matters.

For example:

  • What social engineering actually looks like

  • How attackers create urgency

  • Why certain shortcuts are risky

People who understand attacker intent respond better under pressure.

3. Reinforce Through Small, Frequent Touchpoints

Security awareness works best when it is:

  • Short

  • Relevant

  • Repeated over time

Micro-learning, reminders, and real-world examples outperform annual training marathons.

4. Normalize Reporting and Recovery

Mistakes happen—even in mature programs.

Good PR.AT cultures emphasize:

  • Reporting quickly

  • Learning without blame

  • Improving responses over time

The goal is not zero mistakes.
It is fast detection and recovery.

Metrics That Actually Measure Effectiveness

Training success is not measured by completion rates alone.

Foundational Metrics

  • % of employees completing required training

  • Time to complete onboarding training

  • % of workforce trained by role

These show coverage, not capability.

Better Risk-Based Metrics

  • Phishing report rate

  • Time to report suspicious activity

  • Reduction in repeat phishing failures

  • % of incidents detected by employees

These indicate whether training is changing behavior.

What “Good” Looks Like

When PR.AT is working well:

  • Employees ask better security questions

  • Suspicious activity is reported quickly

  • Mistakes surface early, not late

  • Security teams are seen as partners, not police

  • Leaders model the behavior they expect

For newcomers, this builds confidence.
For new CISOs, it builds organizational trust.
For mature teams, it becomes a risk multiplier.

Final Thoughts

You cannot train people to be security experts.
But you can train them to recognize risk and respond appropriately.

PR.AT acknowledges a simple truth:

Cybersecurity is not just about systems protecting people—it is about people protecting systems.

Strong identity controls reduce exposure.
Strong awareness reduces impact.

Together, they turn cybersecurity from a technical discipline into an organizational capability.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Asset Management - Physical Devices - What do you have? Do you know?

Asset management and inventorying your physical systems, we all know we should do it, and I am sure most try.  I am not going to talk about the should have, would have or could have. Instead, I am going to focus on the risks associated with the NIST CSF control ID-AM.1.   The control simply states, “Physical devices and systems within the organization are inventoried.”  At the simplest level, this control is saying that the organization inventories all physical systems that are apart of the information system. In my opinion, the control is foundational because how can you secure something if you don't know it exists.  If you are not inventorying your systems, how do you know if they have adequate controls to protect the data and network.   If you had a breach of data, would you know what type of data was involved, or would you even know if you had a breach?  To further extend this, how can you perform a risk assessment on the system to understand and relay ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Vulnerability Management… It’s easy - Planning

I am sure you have had either consultants, vendors, or heard at a conference that vulnerability management is foundational security control.  While I agree that it is an essential control, I also understand that it is challenging to implement.  Vulnerability management is not just to pick a tool, scan, and fix issues.  Many components make it a complicated journey.  This series will attempt to help break it down and give you ideas on how this complex service and be delivered effectively.    Planning   Objective When you start, I recommend creating a targeted objective and set of measures against your objective.   Ensure that you keep in mind your organization’s culture, politics, and risk appetite as you are developing your objective.   I have seen some target just “critical” systems for regulatory compliance, whereas others have targeted their entire enterprise.   No matter your scope, keep in mind your team’s current resource...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Detect Function in NIST CSF 2.0: The Risk of Seeing Too Late—or Too Much

In NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (CSF 2.0) , the Detect function represents the organization’s ability to identify the occurrence of a cybersecurity event in a timely and reliable manner . While Protect focuses on reducing the likelihood of compromise, Detect determines how quickly and how accurately an organization recognizes that something has gone wrong. For CISOs and security leaders, detection is where many programs quietly fail. Not due to a lack of tools, but due to poor signal quality, unclear objectives, and misalignment with business impact. Detection that is late, noisy, or misunderstood can be as damaging as no detection at all. Official NIST CSF 2.0 guidance is available here: https://www.nist.gov/publications/nist-cybersecurity-framework-csf-20 What the Detect Function Is (and What It Enables) Under CSF 2.0, the Detect (DE) function focuses on outcomes related to: Continuous monitoring Anomalies and event detection Security logging and analysis Threat intelligence ...
Post a Comment
Read more